Posts Tagged ‘Media’

Obama’s America = Mexico

05/05/2013

I see example after example of how America has changed in recent years. These changes enabled America to elect a man like President Obama, who regularly goes abroad dissing the greatest nation on earth.

And this man is accelerating the changes so as to transform America. He said he would do it and he is. One campaign promise he has been sure to keep. That and redistribution of wealth.

The most recent example of Obama showing contempt for this county was his recent speech to Mexican students to push immigration reform that will further undermine our national security and our national identity. Can you imagine him saying this about us?

This is my fourth visit to Mexico as President.  Each time, I’ve been
inspired—by your culture, by the beauty of this land, and most of all, by the
Mexican people.

Obama proves repeatedly that he does not believe in American exceptionalism. For him to equalize our countries is inappropriate. No one could seriously confuse this nation with Mexico–or any other country. Mexico, in particular, does not have a tradition of democracy. It has a corrupt government that oppresses its people. There may be changes in Mexico to which Obama alludes but I don’t see how he can say with a straight face that we have common values. In addition, he has the nerve to say Mexicans perceive that we disrespect them as we provide them social assistance, which they cannot obtain in their own nation, when they come here, both legally and illegally:

Despite the deep bonds and values we share, attitudes—in both countries—are
sometimes trapped in old stereotypes.  Some Americans only see the Mexico
depicted in sensational headlines of violence and border crossings.  Some
Mexicans may think America disrespects Mexico, that we seek to impose ourselves
on Mexican sovereignty, or, alternatively, wish to wall ourselves off.

How he describes Mexico is really the America of old, but not the America of today under his failed economic and social policies:

Indeed, I see a Mexico that has lifted millions from poverty.  Because of the
sacrifices of generations, a majority of Mexicans now call themselves middle
class, with a quality of life that your parents and grandparents could only
dream of.

Why does Obama promote capitalism in socialist Mexico while trying to inflict socialism on capitalist America?

Here in Mexico, you’ve embarked on ambitious reforms—to make your economy more
competitive and your institutions more accountable to you, the people.

The most incredible thing he said was that it is our guns that are the source of Mexican violence. He claims those who bring guns illegally into Mexico will go to jail. What about the Fast and the Furious? Not only did the American government send guns into Mexico that killed numerous people including an American border patrol agent, Eric Holder, our Attorney General, refused to provide Congress with documentation which led him to being held in contempt of Congress.

We recognize that most of the guns used to commit violence here in Mexico come
from the United States.  … Meanwhile, we’ll keep increasing the pressure on the gun traffickers
who bring illegal guns into Mexico, and we’ll keep putting these criminals where
they belong—behind bars.

Are you surprised that you don’t know any of this? Thank your liberal news media which only cares about gay ballplayers, imaginary global warming and celebrity drunks. Obama is destroying our country while trying to uplift the whole world and few Americans know. He should be running the United Nations, not the United States. We have another three plus years to endure. We need to start paying attention and voting America first since he is not going to protect us as all other American presidents have.

Terror in Boston & American Immigration Policy

04/21/2013

This was a shocking week in American history. In Boston during an annual celebration of Patriots Day two young men allegedly set off bombs at the Boston Marathon that killed and maimed many people. During the manhunt for them, more people died including one of the alleged terrorists. They were not citizens but immigrants from Chechnya, a place known for terrorism.

What can we learn from this? What will we learn?

We should learn that we need to be more careful securing our border. Between the Gang of Eight’s amnesty that is not being called amnesty and the push for immigration reform because we must DO IT NOW!, we are being railroaded into immigration reform. Just like Obamacare.

Almost like gun control.

This need that Democrats and the media claim we have to fix things fast–without reading the countless pages of each bill–is just a way to push an agenda. And let us face the consequences later.

The consequences of Obamacare are coming to fruition as we speak. Anti-American immigration policy–brought to us since the 1960s by Senator Edward Kennedy–has already wreaked havoc.  We need to learn from this incident that laws impact us. And they usually make problems worse when they are not well thought out.

How do we justify our failure to secure our borders to the families who were impacted by the terrorist explosions? President Obama keeps saying we need to pass gun control legislation even if it only saves one child. Using that logic, should we not pass immigration legislation that could save Americans from terrorist attacks like this one? Instead of just throwing our hands up in the air and granting amnesty, which has a history of failure and that will only embolden terrorists to come here and hurt our people, we need to think first, write a bill that will lead to a safer America and pass it.

Yes, change is needed but not the kind proposed by the Gang of Eight. Gang indeed!

While the lessons to be learned should be obvious, what we will learn–as dictated to us by the media–will be that we cannot jump to conclusions and be suspicious of Islamists. That we are united over the death of our fellow Americans and that is a source of patriotism. That we should remain open at our borders to show the world we are not going to give up our freedom. That our diversity is our strength.

Same liberalism despite a changing world. We need to be grown up and acknowledge the world as it is, not how academics imagine it to be on a college campus.

America is special and worth preserving. We must remain free, the beacon of the world. Allowing open borders to permit in people who don’t want what we want but wish to destroy us is not the way. That does not promote true liberty.

Liberals don’t see things as they are but as they want them to be. We citizens have to be realistic and oppose immigration “reform” that does nothing but make an already bad situation worse. The priority should be securing our borders, not legitimizing people who have violated the law. We need to take care of our people but do so in a way that does not violate the Constitution.

Perhaps this will wake the American people up. Time to stop waving flags and to let our representatives know that we oppose legislation that makes us vulnerable to our enemies. We need to vote for people who share our concerns and who are not wedded to an agenda that is harmful to our nation.

Let’s pray for the people of Boston who have gone through a terrible ordeal this week.

Gosnell Versus Arias: Only One Alleged Murderer Makes Headlines

04/14/2013

The conservative media have been covering the Kermit Gosnell murder trial. It has all the elements of a big media story: a man killing numerous people. Plus he is a doctor. The only fly in the ointment? He is an abortionist. And the most important issue to any modern liberal, particularly in the mainstream media, is abortion.

They must preserve it, cover up for it, deny it does what we all know it does.

And so they cannot cover the trial of abortionist Kermit Gosnell, who is alleged to have murdered seven babies who survived abortion and were viable. This is a dirty little secret that the media and liberals want to keep a secret.

Planned Parenthood can call Gosnell an “outlier” but the reality is every abortionist legally kills babies. It is just that he is alleged to have violated the law that allows abortion by killing babies that the law says he cannot legally kill. Because they are 24 weeks and older and because they survived the abortionist’s tools.

Remember that President Obama when he was a state senator in Illinois opposed the ban on “completing” abortions on babies who survive. He voted to deny healthcare to babies who survived the butcher’s knife.  Under his vision, perhaps Kermit would not be on trial? He would just be finishing his evil work with the approval of the government.

Perhaps it is in that spirit that the media ignore Kermit the Killer and embrace Jodi Arias, whose story has made national headlines for months. Why do they cover her? She is a young, attractive woman who allegedly brutally murdered her handsome Mormon boyfriend.

A typical news story that the media loves except for the Mormon angle. That makes it better for them. The only thing they would like even more is if the story involved a Catholic priest.

So we endlessly hear the story–albeit an interesting one–of the alleged murderess. We know this is fascinating and even newsworthy. But does this one murder case have so much more appeal than an abortionist who allegedly slaughtered over half a dozen little people?

We know the media love stories involving dead children–think Newtown massacre–but their interest does not extend to babies who die during or after an abortion. Which is shameful but part of the agenda.

If you need further proof that there is a pro-abortion agenda which includes covering up the evil of abortion–the taking of a human life–you have it with this trial. So you have to educate yourself and not rely on the mainstream media. They cover up and they tell you what they want you to know, not what you need to hear.

Don’t remain ignorant of reality. Education and knowledge empower. Know that all abortions are bad and that those who favor this brutal practice don’t want you to know this basic truth.

The Catholic Church Won’t Change with the Next Pope

03/03/2013

In light of the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI, many are questioning what will happen to the Church. Liberals hope in vain the Church will “evolve” and suddenly turn into something she is not.

They hope, like President Obama, she will suddenly embrace gay marriage.

They delude themselves that suddenly she will allow artificial contraception and perhaps abortion.

They want married priests and women priests and a Church that is no longer Roman Catholic.

It is not going to happen. The Catholic Church has an eternal message of truth that does not change with the times…or with the election of a new pope.

So liberals–particularly those in the media–can wish and hope and fantasize and speculate. But their dreams will not come true.

And it makes me wonder why they, usually non-Catholics, are obsessed with who the next pope is. Knowing the Catholic Church, they know that she won’t change. So if they cannot change her, they want to malign her.

They want to sew dissatisfaction among the faithful to advance their agenda. What institution other than the Church stands up for traditional morality–also known in politics as the social issues–on a consistent basis, unwavering and uncompromising?

You cannot think of one, can you? Not the Republican party. Not mainstream Protestantism. Not the government or the schools.

So that is why the liberals–in their never-ending quest to destroy what is right–want to finally tackle the Catholic Church. But Jesus Himself said the gates of Hell will never prevail against her.

Let the liberals try but know that whoever the cardinals elect as pope the Church will not change her positions. Because the truth does not change.

For those Catholics who do not accept the truth because it is inconvenient for them or because they have a poorly formed conscience, they don’t have to stay Catholic. And non-Catholic liberals who want to destroy the Church can blather on for naught.

Let us pray for the Catholic Church and for the cardinals as they enter the conclave that they may be inspired by the Holy Spirit to elect a good and holy man as the next pope in accord with God’s will.

Let us also pray for Benedict for his lifetime of faithful service to the Church. May God bless him and His Church.

Finally, let us pray for Catholics during this time of reflection that we may be better people and repent as God calls us to do.

“Criminal Minds” Misuses Christianity to Push Gay Agenda

02/23/2013

The downside of the DVR revolution is that I didn’t get to see Criminal Minds until last night as opposed to watching it live when it aired on Wednesday. Usually I enjoy the show although it is a bit violent and often gruesome.

The topic of the most recent episode of the CBS drama was a homosexual serial killer. We know that gays are not depicted as anything but good and funny and oppressed on TV. So the fact that the gay guy is on a murdering spree cannot be his fault.

And it wasn’t! It was the fault of a conversion therapy program which liberals detest.

So Criminal Minds, like other recent CBS hits, has become political.

I was shocked when Person of Interest showed a married (in New York) lesbian couple who were beautiful, accomplished and very much in love. I mean, they don’t show straight couples this much in love! Sheer propaganda. And The Mentalist featured an episode where a gay young man could not tell his father about his sexuality and he faked his own death so he could work as a drag queen. The father was the bad guy for not accepting his son’s desires.

CBS has apparently gone from producing interesting shows to pushing the gay agenda much like ABC.

Criminal Minds stepped over the line and went beyond propaganda by misusing Christianity to justify its pro-homosexual message.

The conversion therapy program is presented as shady, wrong, and, quite frankly, as torture. The program is also remotely Christian in nature. The murderer had advised his father that he had same-sex attraction so the dad sent the murderer to the conversion therapy camp which has a website citing Leviticus’ prohibition against homosexual activity.

Due to being “indoctrinated” that his feelings were wrong, the murderer was conflicted. When he gave in to his homosexual impulses, he felt bad afterward and killed his partner. When he tried to be normal and have relations with women, he killed them when he could not get aroused.

When the FBI team finally catches up to him, he is treated unlike other perpetrators since he was told by the conversion therapy program to deny his sexuality, that it was wrong and that he was “broken” (the name of the episode). So, you see, the fact that he murdered four people was not his fault. He is told by the FBI team he can assist in closing the conversion therapy camp which caused his behavior. The camp is duly invaded by the authorities.

I would have chalked this up as typical propaganda but the end of the episode had the senior member of the team quoting Jesus saying to love one another to justify sodomy.

For liberal Hollywood, this is a new low.

When Jesus told us to love one another, He meant a holy love, the love He has for us. He was not talking about anything sexual. He certainly was not justifying sodomy. And CBS knows that. But it serves the propaganda that homosexuality is normal and inborn and even holy.

Liberals accuse those who accept the Bible prohibition against sodomy as misusing the Bible when that is exactly what they did here by misquoting Jesus in favor of homosexuality. Clearly, there is no basis in the Bible to support sodomy.

The solution? Embrace the truth and stop watching Criminal Minds.

Ash Wednesday, Abortion & the Pope

02/13/2013

Even though there is no mainstream effort to outlaw abortion–there should be, of course–liberals are paranoid about it. They are convinced that every Republican–even RINOs–is trying to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Ironically, outlawing Roe would not end legalized abortion. It would just return the decision back to the states. So New York and California would still have abortion even if Kansas and Mississippi banned it.

I mention this because for someone in New York, where many crazed libs live, the idea that abortion could be in imminent danger of being criminalized is ridiculous.

As you know from my prior post, my elderly relative survived her hospital stay for the flu. She is now doing rehab in a Catholic nursing home. Tonight she got a new roommate, an elderly woman who seemed pleasant enough upon our meeting.

But then as I was talking to my relative, both of us sporting ashes, the topic of Mitt Romney came up.  The neighbor–about 75 years old–criticized Chris Christie and then said Romney scared her. She was so glad he was not elected president. I could not imagine why so I had to ask.

I thought she was going to mention the dog on the roof or foreign policy or maybe even the economy–as silly as all those reasons are. But she surprised me by saying she was afraid Romney was opposed to abortion and would ban it.

Mr. Romney was not exactly known for his pro-life position even though I believe he was sincere in espousing life. But realistically if he were elected, he was going to try to fix the economy, not limit abortion.

I was so horrified that she would say such a thing. As an elderly woman. In a Catholic nursing home. On Ash Wednesday.

And I told her so. My relative and I said we are Catholic and oppose abortion. I also said that Obama loves abortion. The other lady shut up. What a silly thing to say and how stupid people are. The result: four more years of disastrous Obama policies that are destroying the country for something that was not going to happen.

So I wonder, what is wrong with people and then I wonder, why are the media obsessed with the pope’s announcement he is retiring because he does not feel physically able to continue in the position?

The answer is, as always, abortion. Liberals believe that if we could just get a liberal pope–one they consider progressive and modern and willing to change with the times–the Church would abandon her position on abortion (and gay marriage and every other hot button social issue that drives these people).

The thing is, it will never happen. The Church’s teachings do not change. Liberals who have no legitimate interest in our religion can pine away for their ultimate enemy to capitulate, but it will never happen. Jesus Himself said so.

Pro-abortion advocates will not be happy until everyone sees things their way. But they seek the impossible. And it makes them crazed. Like the lady who would fear Romney because he might take away an abortion she will never need as an elderly lady sans uterus.

And on a day like this, the holy start to the Lenten season, we who have faith and embrace the truth need to pray for God’s will, including an end to abortion and for the next pope to be brave and bold in proclaiming the gospel. And we should also pray for those obsessed by promoting the death of the innocent. They are to be pitied and we should seek their conversion, especially during this holy season.

Forty Years of Roe v. Wade: Shame on Us!

01/22/2013

I keep seeing things in the media and the world that make me feel ashamed to be an American. Whether it is seeing gay men get married under state law or politicians exploiting children to ban guns or Hollywood using its award shows to slam conservatives like Sarah Palin, I cringe.

This is not the nation I grew up in. But maybe I am wrong. Maybe this is exactly the country of my birth. I was born not too long after the Supreme Court upended our nation’s laws and legalized the killing of innocents.

Since I was old enough to know abortion was wrong, I have opposed it. It has defined me and horrified me. The pro-choice arguments have angered and puzzled me. Angered me because they were untrue and puzzled me because they were so blatantly wrong and evil that I could not see how people could be misled by them–unless they wanted to be misled.

Abortion is ultimately about being selfish. Being a mother–or even giving a child up for adoption–is a selfless act. Killing a baby because the child is inconvenient is the most selfish thing I can imagine. My favorite argument that used to be prevalent was that abortion prevented child abuse. So one kills the child so he will not live to be abused!

It is like when former Attorney General Janet Reno ordered the Waco compound raided, killing the people inside, including the children, to save them from child abuse. By killing them!

To liberals this makes sense but it cannot make sense to a rational human being. Unfortunately, using reason is going the way of the typewriter. We are instead in the age of emotion and feelings.

I don’t feel like having a baby, a woman can think, but instead of zipping up her pants, she engages in inappropriate sexual behavior and becomes pregnant. A good time to man up and take personal responsibility–also verboten in our society–but often it leads to ending a baby’s precious life.

The worst thing one can do–kill the innocent.

Yet, unfortunately, this is not considered the worst thing a person can do. Among things that are considered evil in our society are not recognizing sodomy as a civil right, being fat, making a woman pay for her own contraceptives, and judging liberals for their lifestyle choices.

Abortion doesn’t even crack the top ten of social sins in post-reason America. And it is a shame on the level of slavery, which we all recognize as the worst thing this nation had done prior to the legislation from the bench known as Roe v. Wade.

For forty years we have seen our nation deteriorate and few dare link the decline to a society where women kill as often as they nurture, a nation that glorifies violence while trying to blame it on guns and not perpetrators, and a country where unloving sexual activity is celebrated at the expense of intact family units and traditional values. Values that helped to develop this land into the greatest nation the world has ever seen.

In light of the moral decline, which can be attributed to abortion on demand combined with unrestrained sexuality, I am not only ashamed of my country for what it is now but for what it has been all my life. It just took this long to fully bear the evil fruit.

We must outlaw abortion, embrace traditional morality and repent if we hope to have a country we can be proud of again. Like ending slavery, making abortion illegal is a very important first step.

All righteous movements must start with the tiniest step like that of a little baby. Do enough of us have the moral fiber not to give up and to continue to advocate for our unborn brothers and sisters?

National Cathedral Sanctifies Sin

01/09/2013

I was shocked–but not really–by the announcement by the National Cathedral that it will allow gay weddings. The Episcopal church now allows its ministers–if they choose–to “marry” two men or two women where it is legal to do so.

Apparently no one told the Episcopalians that the Bible–the basis for their church–disallows homosexual activity, let alone marriage.

We all know marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Liberals have tried to convince us that because gays can be nice and funny and smart that means their desires are normal and should be recognized by calling their union something it is not–you know, marriage.

Unfortunately, liberal elites–including gay fellow travellers most of whom are liberal–have convinced many Americans, particularly the young, that homosexuality is natural and since they are born this way, it is discrimination to deny them the right to marry.

One does not lead to another. And there is no definitive proof that people are born gay anyway.

As everyone used to know, homosexuality is not normal. It certainly isn’t biblical. The Bible is quite clear that sodomy is a no-no. There is no basis for thinking it is Christian to marry two people of the same sex even if they supposedly love each other.

The Catholics know this. I wish our leaders were stronger about telling the truth but no Catholic can claim not to know the truth. People do but they are disingenuous. Catholic teaching is clear.

Episcopal teaching is confused–leading to many Anglicans jumping ship for the Catholic Church. What the Episcopalians are doing is not only bad for membership, it is an affront to God. They are sanctifying sin by calling sodomy sacred.

This is not the case. All unmarried sex is sinful but the American people for the most part don’t believe that and have severed themselves from traditional Christian thought. To their own spiritual detriment.

In fact, not only are the Episcopalians calling sin good, they are making it a civil rights issue. I was offended to read an Episcopal lady bishop compare so-called marriage equality to the fight against discrimination against blacks.

There is no comparison. Yet I fear when the Supreme Court takes up the marriage issue in March and rules in June that we will experience another Roe v. Wade moment wherein all the pro-traditional marriage laws will be struck down under the guise that they violate the Constitution.

Despite the understanding of what marriage is for over two millenia, I suspect the Court will make up a right to gay marriage just like it made up a right to abortion. Considering the Court reversed itself in one generation on the “right” to sodomy and in light of the pro-homosexual agenda pushed by the media and Hollywood, I think we are losing this issue and worse we are losing what it means to be a Christian nation.

Many will say that is good–the Obama voters and their compatriots–but for Christian Americans we know that our great nation cannot survive any more embrace of immorality.

May God have mercy on us and may our religious leaders lead us in this time of distress!

Tragedy Should Not Be Exploited by Gun Grabbers

12/15/2012

When I first heard about the school shooting, I thought it was horrific. We must pray for the victims and the survivors. We must look into the causes as we always do when these things happen. This is twice in one week.

The easy–and wrong–response is to blame guns. Just recently a man in China attacked almost two dozen kids with a knife. There is less crime in states with right to carry laws. An armed citizenry can stop the occasional nut who starts shooting at innocent people.

If banning guns is not the answer, then we need to figure out what is. I previously had written about the culture, specifically violence as entertainment, as at least one cause of this kind of violence. We see movie after movie where violence is glamorized and is unrealistically portrayed. Human life is presented as highly disposable.

Young men–the usual suspects in any society for meaningless and angry violence–are raised on this visual violence and may be increasingly unable to separate fact from fiction. Between the movies and the video games that are so life-like, my thought is that these young teens and adults want to act out what they experience in the video games they have played maniacally for years.

It is like pornography. If you recall serial killer Ted Bundy, who repented before he was executed, he said he started looking at porn as a young man and it awakened something in him wherein he had to escalate. Unlike most people who view porn who are damaged by it but who do not become homicidal, he could not control his urges and murdered many innocent women.

I wonder if that is happening with these mass shootings. Instead of one by one killing like a serial killer does, the mass shooter is in effect living out the violent video games. Just like the rare person, perhaps a sex addict, who becomes a serial killer, it is the rare person, perhaps a gamer, who becomes a mass murderer.

We do not know what the case is here. This young man possibly had mental health issues which are generally not adequately treated in this country although the population is highly medicated. But blindly banning guns is not the answer. We could just as easily advocate banning violent video games. While that is a First Amendment issue, banning guns is a Second Amendment issue.

Most people can watch video games, even violent ones, and not commit crimes. Most people who own guns use them responsibly. Banning is not the answer.

Besides video games, this is a culture that puts no restraints on people. And, as Gov. Mike Huckabee correctly pointed out, it is a culture that has kicked God out of the classroom and the town square. And then some people have the nerve to blame God! God did not shoot anyone and we have told Him as a society we don’t want Him or His protection.

Besides not letting this crisis be used as an excuse to disarm the American people, we need to repent and turn to God and become a good society once again. These things did not happen when we were a moral culture.

Is Bisexuality the New Gay Frontier?

12/01/2012

The gays have won. Certainly in the media. And amazingly in the country and most importantly among the young based on the election results.

It is accepted by the mainstream of American society–pushed largely by the media and Hollywood–that gays are funny and smart and talented and are entitled to the same rights we have. Meaning marriage and adoption.

Their “right” to marriage equality trumps the rights of religious people–particularly Catholics–to exercise their right to religious practice. Catholic adoption agencies have gone out of business rather than violate their beliefs in placing innocent children with homosexual couples.

And that is just fine with the media and more ominously the government, which has the job to protect our rights, not violate them or dictate which rights are more important than others.

Since gays have become fully accepted in society and dominate so much of it after relentless promotion of their agenda from The Golden Girls to Ellen to Queer Eye for the Straight Guy to The L Word, the next step in promoting non-traditional sexuality seems to be bisexuality.

I think this is ironic since we are told that homosexuals are born with same-sex attraction and thus preventing them from marrying and adopting is unfair because they have to be who they are. But if people are bisexual, is that inborn as well or is that a choice?

The liberal jury is still out but bisexuality is usually advanced as being even better than being gay because one is attracted to the person, not the gender. It is so impossibly broad-minded as to make sexuality meaningless.

Two quick examples. On Revenge, part of ABC’s pro-gay agenda, the billionaire Nolan Ross has complicated sexuality. Basically friendless despite his massive wealth, he has had romantic interludes with a couple of men and at least one woman. On the most recent episode of flashbacks, it showed him kissing, in a politically correct way, a Latino employee whom he appeared to be dating.

(Source: fanpop.com)

Previously, he dated another employee, a woman who appeared to be Indian-American. He also had sex with a white man who was a grifter and Harvard dropout.

Maybe Nolan just likes diversity in every possible way imaginable?

The point is, he is presented as a good person who is not confused about his sexuality. He is exploring it and falling in love with the person. He is just too–wait for it–enlightened!

Then I was surprised to read an article in December’s Marie Claire about a woman who dated another woman for several years–before marrying a man and having a child! What? Instead of concluding she was having emotional problems that she outgrew, she determines that she is enlightened because in having a sexual relationship with a woman she has ”learned freedom.”

Ten years ago–maybe even five–I could not have made this up. But here is a woman bragging about falling head over heels for another woman. “It was as if my whole view of what was sexy, sensual, and possible had just turned on its axis.”

She further states, “I was bisexual and thought everyone else could be, too, if given the chance….The important element is chemistry….”

Now that the gays have fully penetrated society–pun intended–the next frontier of dismantling traditional sexuality is bisexuality. Our liberal leaders and opinion makers will not rest until sexuality is fully separated from nature and morality. Now that they have convinced us that sodomy is normal and righteous, they are moving to the next level and brainwashing us that sexuality is not determined by nature but by attractions that we can develop if only we would open ourselves up to them.

What we must do is not violate God’s law on human sexuality. We need to live chastely in accordance with our state in life. So single people need to zip up their pants and married men and women must only have relations with their spouses. Antiquated ideas I know but ones that have kept humanity moving forward for thousands of years.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 53 other followers