Posts Tagged ‘Sarah Palin’

Elderly, Be Afraid: Death Panels Are Near!

02/09/2013

I have an elderly relative–about 90 years young–who is smart and wonderful and holy and good. She unfortunately caught the flu and had to be hospitalized.

In the past, one got sick and one went to the hospital to get well. But the Obamacare mentality has descended upon many healthcare providers. And these people seem determined to rid the world of the elderly.

Being old does not make one less human. Tell that to doctors who would be super-sensitive to a young illegal–excuse me, I mean undocumented–pregnant woman with no insurance. I also see them bending over backwards to be accommodating to a homosexual man diagnosed with AIDS.

So why should old people count for any less? Doctors are not supposed to judge. They should treat the person, not their characteristics such as age.

Well, during this lovely lady’s recent hospitalization she was told that she was old and that is why she was not responding well to the flu, which I admit is a serious disease. It turns out she was overloaded with fluid in the ER and that is why she nearly died. Not because she was old.

In advocating on her behalf–and one must have an advocate in this day and age!–I engaged in battle with a series of doctors who kept telling me how old this woman is. As if I didn’t know. I say, treat. They say, but she’s old.

She has recovered this time as she had in the past. She just needed to be given the opportunity. It is not for the doctors to judge.

It’s not as if the docs are free from mistakes. While my relative was being treated for the flu, she was transferred from isolation into a room with someone else who had the flu–but it was a different strain! She was quietly transferred back to her own room.

Did I mention that this is the best hospital in New York City?

The best part was that while the flu was still ravaging her poor lungs, the resident in charge was trying to get her transferred to short term rehab. That is a nursing home for those of you that don’t know.

Nursing homes have a purpose but one does not want to go there before one is ready. It means a return to the ER in short order–or a death sentence.

And it is not for a doctor to choose who lives and who dies. Doctors should treat the patient, the actual person. Just like we would not tolerate medical judgments based on race or sex, we should not have young docs dismissing the elderly just because they are old.

When Sarah Palin brought the death panels to our attention, she was ridiculed but she was prescient. Obamacare has not gone fully into effect but the mentality is already in place. Whether official or not, old people are at a disadvantage when they enter health care institutions.

One should be vigilant because the death panels are coming. What is unofficial now will become official in the coming years. Old people and those who love them, watch out!

Forty Years of Roe v. Wade: Shame on Us!

01/22/2013

I keep seeing things in the media and the world that make me feel ashamed to be an American. Whether it is seeing gay men get married under state law or politicians exploiting children to ban guns or Hollywood using its award shows to slam conservatives like Sarah Palin, I cringe.

This is not the nation I grew up in. But maybe I am wrong. Maybe this is exactly the country of my birth. I was born not too long after the Supreme Court upended our nation’s laws and legalized the killing of innocents.

Since I was old enough to know abortion was wrong, I have opposed it. It has defined me and horrified me. The pro-choice arguments have angered and puzzled me. Angered me because they were untrue and puzzled me because they were so blatantly wrong and evil that I could not see how people could be misled by them–unless they wanted to be misled.

Abortion is ultimately about being selfish. Being a mother–or even giving a child up for adoption–is a selfless act. Killing a baby because the child is inconvenient is the most selfish thing I can imagine. My favorite argument that used to be prevalent was that abortion prevented child abuse. So one kills the child so he will not live to be abused!

It is like when former Attorney General Janet Reno ordered the Waco compound raided, killing the people inside, including the children, to save them from child abuse. By killing them!

To liberals this makes sense but it cannot make sense to a rational human being. Unfortunately, using reason is going the way of the typewriter. We are instead in the age of emotion and feelings.

I don’t feel like having a baby, a woman can think, but instead of zipping up her pants, she engages in inappropriate sexual behavior and becomes pregnant. A good time to man up and take personal responsibility–also verboten in our society–but often it leads to ending a baby’s precious life.

The worst thing one can do–kill the innocent.

Yet, unfortunately, this is not considered the worst thing a person can do. Among things that are considered evil in our society are not recognizing sodomy as a civil right, being fat, making a woman pay for her own contraceptives, and judging liberals for their lifestyle choices.

Abortion doesn’t even crack the top ten of social sins in post-reason America. And it is a shame on the level of slavery, which we all recognize as the worst thing this nation had done prior to the legislation from the bench known as Roe v. Wade.

For forty years we have seen our nation deteriorate and few dare link the decline to a society where women kill as often as they nurture, a nation that glorifies violence while trying to blame it on guns and not perpetrators, and a country where unloving sexual activity is celebrated at the expense of intact family units and traditional values. Values that helped to develop this land into the greatest nation the world has ever seen.

In light of the moral decline, which can be attributed to abortion on demand combined with unrestrained sexuality, I am not only ashamed of my country for what it is now but for what it has been all my life. It just took this long to fully bear the evil fruit.

We must outlaw abortion, embrace traditional morality and repent if we hope to have a country we can be proud of again. Like ending slavery, making abortion illegal is a very important first step.

All righteous movements must start with the tiniest step like that of a little baby. Do enough of us have the moral fiber not to give up and to continue to advocate for our unborn brothers and sisters?

Reviewing Obama’s Failures-Part 2: Healthcare “Reform”

10/06/2012

We have already examined President Obama’s promotion of abortion and that leads naturally to one of the vehicles he is using to do it, Obamacare. It also is the vehicle for promoting the unnatural end of life via the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB aka death panels). I heard a statistic that the majority of healthcare costs are spent in the last year of a person’s life. Fewer sick elderly means health savings but at what cost???

In his eye-opening debate performance this week, Obama actually referenced the 15-member panel of “experts” who will be dictating our care if Obamacare is implemented. Sarah Palin famously called them death panels because if they decide our care, they will decide who lives and who dies. Decisions will no longer be between you and your doctor.

(Source: chumpysclipart.com)

Anyone over aged 65 should be more scared of Obama’s minions than Paul Ryan’s modest proposals to reform–and thus save–Medicare. In fact, Paul Ryan brings truth to a murky topic. I cited just some of the cuts to Medicare that he has been trumpeting as a failure by Bam in a post over two years ago. This is real, not a lie as liberals allege. Then again, who are better experts on lying than liberals who are master practitioners?

Healthcare destruction not only affects the quality and quantity of our healthcare, but there are moral implications. But that is the point, isn’t it? The president has used his message of healthcare for all (except babies that survive  abortions!) to implement the mandate that all insurers–even of religious organizations with moral objections–provide contraception, sterilization and abortifacients to the employees of the companies they insure for free.

This is madness. Pure and simple. But it is not just the individual policies but the very premise of this law that is un-American.

The central part of Obamacare that is flawed is the individual mandate forcing Americans to enter commerce which the government is then regulating. While the Supreme Court sidestepped this issue by instead calling Obamacare a tax, this law requires compulsion. Either comply or pay the fine. Either way is disastrous to our freedom, our heath and our pocketbooks.

Mitt Romney will repeal healthcare destruction and all patriots should be committed to this goal. The Supreme Court failed us and Mitt is our only hope before American healthcare–the greatest in the world–is destroyed and nationalized. If Obama has a second term, there will be no stopping the ruination of our healthcare and the country whose path to socialism will be virtually irreversible.

31 days to the most important election of our lifetimes…

First Birth Control, Now Porn?

03/18/2012

Rick Santorum, trying to establish himself as a socially conservative alternative to Mitt Romney, repeatedly has taken the bait of the media to make social issues the focus of the campaign for president. He has gone from railing against birth control to fighting obscenity.

As a social conservative, I would love for our issues to be the top concern of the American people. But, if they were, we would never have elected someone like President Obama. Granted, he ran as some kind of moderate–it’s amazing really that people could believe this in light of his radical position on abortion. But the economy was crashing and John McCain made no effort to show Obama for what he was. And people wanted to believe in so-called hope and change.

I remember the change mantra of Bill Clinton. The change he gave us was immorality and dishonesty. After impeachment and countless scandals, we got George Bush. Despite 9/11, the first decade of this century was largely prosperous. But the crash brought us Obama and, despite his claims to save the economy, he has failed to do so.

Which should pave the way for the Republican presidential nominee.

While Romney is on the trajectory toward the nomination by focusing on the economy and the failures of President Obama on this key issue, Santorum has created this sideshow where he focuses on the social issues. Not normal ones like opposing abortion and gay marriage.

Image Detail

(Source: www.pinskipolitics.com)

These are issues which are very much talked about and relevant during the election. Related issues are positions on embryonic stem cell research and the threat to religious liberty by the Obama birth control mandate.

But righteous Rick, good man that he is, is going to places that he doesn’t have to go. As I will tell everyone who will listen, Rick is not going to send the police into women’s bedrooms and confiscate their birth control. He is not going to prevent the porn peddlers from corrupting the people.

But he says just enough that the media can malign him to the point where if he were the nominee, he would be done on arrival. The media would love for him to get the nomination so they can falsely paint him as a Catholic conservative extremist. He will get the Sarah Palin treatment. He is unabashed in his love of God and his family, especially his disabled child. To the media and the elites that makes him the enemy.

But while I respect him as a true believer, he is not going to persuade the mushy middle by addressing issues that are non-issues. Of course, the government should not be funding birth control or abortion. And certainly obscenity should be prosecuted and I am sure a Santorum administration–and any Republican administration–would. However, these are not issues that arouse the interest of unemployed Americans–and other Americans who unfortunately love their birth control and their porn.

I am not suggesting that Santorum or any of the candidates bypass important social issues. I am suggesting that when the media is setting a candidate up, he not take the bait and fall for the set-up. Be like Democrats who don’t admit to their agenda. Focus on that which the Dems don’t want the spotlight on.

In other words, engage with intelligence. And don’t fall prey to the media traps which will then be taken out of context and used to pummel our side. Stand up for the truth and focus on that which we can hope to change, not on theoretical issues which are not part of the national debate.

Abortion Is No Different from Infanticide

03/03/2012

Controversy recently arose when medical ethicists argued that abortion is no different from infanticide, the killing of a newborn baby.

For those who know that life begins at conception, we wholeheartedly agree. That group includes all pro-lifers and should include all scientists. Biology 101. But we see knowing life begins at conception doesn’t save people from making a crucial error in logic.

You see, these so-called ethicists conclude that abortion is the same as infanticide and then further conclude…that it is morally acceptable! And they like to call infanticide after-birth abortion!

That is right. These folks consider newborns non-persons, not worthy of legal protections and having only a potential right to live.

Image Detail

(Source: http://www.baby-wallpapers.net/wallpaper/newborn-baby_w285.html)

So they conclude you can kill newborns if they are disabled.

The Spartans were this cruel. As were the Nazis and Communists.

Only God decides who lives and who dies. Someone forgot to tell these over-educated snobs that is how it works. No man can dictate to another man when life begins or when someone becomes a person. A new life–a new person–is formed from the moment that an egg meets a sperm. It is as simple as that, both morally and biologically.

But not to professional thinkers who like to cause intellectual mischief. And these ideas, while initially considered offensive, slowly permeate the culture and gain acceptance.

Think about it. Abortion used to be condemned by feminists, real feminists like Susan B. Anthony. Now it is the chief sacrament in their self-centered religion of choice.

If one can justify partial-birth abortion involving scissors being used on the skull of an almost born baby, how much of a stretch is it to legitimize killing the baby once born?  Under the excuse of the child being disabled. And thus an economic burden on the family and the state.

I can see this evil idea becoming accepted as a choice and then as an obligation. Wasn’t Sarah Palin criticized for giving birth to a child with Down’s Syndrome?

And the idea that these “philosophers” are just spinning their wheels looking for controversy holds no water either. As Newt Gingrich pointed out in a recent presidential debate, President Obama, when he was an Illinois state senator, advocated against a bill that would have precluded doctors from killing babies that survived an abortion.

Newt called it infanticide. And when he is right, he is right.

So you have a president that supports partial-birth abortion and infanticide–although he won’t call it that–and he presents himself as a moderate. Who knows what his second term would bring?

I hope this controversy wakes people up and shines the spotlight on the evil of abortion. Abortion is truly no different from–and is just as evil as–infanticide.

The Unelectables

01/22/2012

Seeing President Obama belt out the Motown tune–and sounding quite good and smooth–reminded me of why he will win and any Republican of the bunch running will lose. He is supremely self-confident, undeniably charismatic and sufficiently attractive. For someone who is more akin to Jimmy Carter than Ronald Reagan, that is quite amazing.

Our guys are dithering, boring and unmemorable. Newt Gingrich may argue well and be a good debater, but he has a ton of baggage. His conversion to Catholicism will not provide cover for his serial cheating. He also is mercurial and inconsistent. Any man who would sit on a couch with Nancy Pelosi and carp about so-called global warming will never get my vote. That is not conservative or even rational.

Rick Santorum has great morals but lacks personality. Maybe he would be a great vice president for someone. If only we could find that someone.

Sarah Palin is starting to look good, isn’t she?

(Source: Archives.com)

Ron Paul is wonderful on so many things–especially isolationism and the Federal Reserve–but he will not be able to defeat Obama. Not only is he old, he will be seen as a humorless crank against Mr. Velvet Voice.

And then there is the nominal front runner, Mitt Romney, who came in second last time to John McCain. Stop and think about it. I don’t think it was because of his flip flopping; back then it was due to his Mormonism, which may still be a problem. Compared to a Muslim secularist, Mormons don’t seem so strange, magic underwear and all.

At least he looks like the president. But he does not act like one. He is a businessman and I don’t think he is interested in the other issues. Right now with the economy being what it is, maybe that is enough.

Besides his need to be moderate Mitt, Romney is so careful that he ends up making mistakes. Like the thing with his tax returns? So he is rich. Apparently that is more objectionable than being Mormon these days.

Being wealthy is not a crime. This country is built on rags to riches stories. He should be a role model; he should not be ashamed.

But he is embarrassed and is playing into the hands of the liberals.

Which he will also do as the nominee. So we will lose.

I have been saying this for a long time in the hope I would be wrong, but the situation gets worse and worse.

(Source: Reason.com)

If Newt somehow gets the nomination, Obama will run as the calm family man and will get the moderate family man vote.

If Mitt gets the nomination, as expected, he will do as McCain did three years ago and not question Obama. He will be wishy washy; he will play it safe; and he will lose.

My only hope for him is that he gets angry and Obama makes mistakes that the media is willing to cover.

You know, when Hell freezes over.

Republican Candidates Who Cannot Defeat Obama

09/17/2011

It is really early to think about the 2012 election–or at least it was before Labor Day. I have been casually observing the field and wanted to share my thoughts. First, I am still not impressed with our choices. Some of the folks I really admire–like Sen. Jim DeMint–don’t want to run.

There is also Gov. Chris Christie, who would be a great candidate if he loses weight. As I have mentioned before, this nation is so looks-obsessed that a person of size–cute as he may otherwise be!–does not have a chance.

(Source: Philly.com)

He could be in fighting shape in 2016–after President Obama’s second term. (Not to be pessimistic but I don’t think our 50% or so who work and pay taxes will be able to defeat those on the dole and those benefitting from government largesse such as unions. Those people vote! Often more than once or after they are no longer alive. It is easy being a Democrat in this country.)

But let us deal in the pitiful reality of who is actually running. No one from 2008–that’s you, Gov. Mitt Romney!–should run again. If one cannot defeat Sen. John McCain, then one cannot be elected dog catcher (do they still elect people dog catcher?)

Why did Mitt lose? Well, the Mormon thing was a problem for primary voters. That might not be a problem this time after having had a secularist-Muslim president. He also had the problem of being a flip flopper–he was liberal on abortion, for example, when he was governor in insane Massachusetts. Now he is pro-life.

I hope he is and wish him well. But I am skeptical.

Unfortunately, I also doubt our new front runner, Gov. Rick Perry. I love the whole Texas swagger and the outrageous things he says. His comments on Social Security aren’t even crazy–they are dead on. I know as someone under forty that Social Security will not be there for me. The U.S. government could teach Bernie Madoff on how to really run a Ponzi scheme.

(more…)

9/11: Victory for Secularists and Muslims?

09/11/2011

To follow up on my recent post on 9/11, I want to raise the issue of who won the battle of 9/11. While our military crushed the terrorists with overwhelming force, could the radical Islamists be the real winners? And what about the secularists?

To start with the secularists, they are making great progress as exemplified by Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s decision to exclude the clergy from today’s 9/11 commemoration because of alleged separation of church and state. The Catholic League has been front and center in calling out Bloomberg’s hypocrisy. Like a good elitist, he loves promoting minority religions such as Islam, but does nothing for majority faiths like Christianity.

Not allowing clergy to speak today is inexcusable. I was frustrated hearing all the ethnic names–usually associated with Catholics–being read today and knowing that their families were being denied the comfort of their spiritual advisers.

Ten years ago the religious leaders were heralded for their work related to 9/11. In the months after that horrible event, Americans seemed to turn to God. But then the secularists–including the aggressive atheists–kept pushing this great nation away from what is right. The war on God continued. And it shows no signs of stopping.

(Source: www.patheos.com)

The fact that anyone would defend Bloomberg’s decision is in itself shocking. That anyone could agree that having people of faith is divisive is absurd. It is secular thinking, pure and simple. And in just ten short years we went from a nation who appreciated the role of faith to a country that accepts tolerance for everyone except Christians.

For all the talk about Muslims having suffered in this nation because of 9/11, I don’t see the Muslims as the ones who face discrimination. Certainly not at the hands of the elites, whose targets firmly remain conservative Christians. One of the reasons they hate Sarah Palin so much is her faith.

But there was no massive response in this country to Muslims after 9/11. In fact, they have become more accepted in this society and, like gays, are now considered a special class. In other words, one can make fun of Christians as much as they want, but the same person would be denounced for even the mildest criticism of a Muslim.

If that is not progress for Muslims, then I don’t know what is.

(more…)

Bachmann: Hope for the Republicans

03/24/2011

Rep. Michele Bachmann, a true conservative hero from the leftist state of Minnesota, is getting ready to run for president of the United States of America.

This is terrific news. I was bemoaning our choices the other day of Newt Gingrich and Tim Pawlenty. Bachmann would be an excellent choice. She is just like Sarah Palin without all the negativity.

As much as I love Sarah, the media hatestorm would be too much and the election would be about her and not the desperate state of the nation.

Michele is smart, attractive, experienced, outspoken and courageous. This puts her head and shoulders above all other possible candidates for the Republican nation.

(http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2009/03/26/image4895111x.jpg)

Better than Newt, Tim, Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, or even Chris Christie.

As Sarah predicted, we need the Mama Grizzlies of America to save us. The men have not done a good job. The Republican leadership–though claiming to be conservative–are no better than RINOs.

They are not getting results and the change we voted for has not yet come to fruition.

We need good, solid leadership to whip the Republicans in the House and Senate into shape. The Old Guard is still running the party. The Republicans need to act more like Tea Party activists.

And Michele is perfect since she is a Republican but well-regarded by the Tea Party. She has the right  values and is unafraid to share them even if these values, embraced by the American majority, are rejected and mocked by the liberal elites in the media and Hollywood and academia.

They are not the majority; we are. And we need someone who can stand up to President Obama.

Let’s be honest–a white man cannot challenge Obama without being called a racist. A woman can be bold and fearless and Michele is nothing but that.

This is a woman who will take on her fellow Republicans and Obama. She said last year:

“We need to go toe-to-toe, eyeball-to-eyeball with the president and say, Mr. President, you are wrong on the government takeover of healthcare.”

The difference between Michele and other Republicans is she means it. She is trustworthy. She means what she says and says what she means.

That is refreshing in a leader. And would be a fantastic trait in a president.

It is time for us to be led by an old-fashioned Mama Grizzly!

Re-Electing Obama?

03/15/2011

President Obama has little going for him right now. He has expressed a preference for running China over the U.S.A. (take him, please!), he is–for lack of a better word–leading the country during one international crisis after another (making Hillary look good in the process if that is possible), and he is keeping up his personal life (golfing, throwing parties, and following closely basketball).

Was this the change the majority of idiots–I mean Americans–voted for? And will they re-elect him?

I am afraid the answer to the former is no but the latter is yes. Which is mind-boggling when you think about it.

(http://www.tvweek.com/blogs/ratings-chart-attack/2009/02/10/ObamaFirstPressConference09.jpg)

Not only has Bam spent the first couple of years bowing to foreign leaders and apologizing for this great nation, he has now indicated that it would be easier to run a communist country. Well, of course it is–no criticism and a fawning state-run media.

Actually, maybe he is running China and no one told the American people.

Unfortunately, he is technically our president. But it’s shocking that an American leader–albeit a socialist–would admit that he thinks being the chief commie would be less stressful for him.

He never read the part of the Reagan manual that says the president should be America’s greatest cheerleader. Guess they don’t teach that at Harvard.

(more…)


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 53 other followers